TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of simple active referrals of different intensities on smoking abstinence and smoking cessation services attendance
T2 - a cluster-randomized clinical trial
AU - Weng, Xue
AU - Luk, Tzu Tsun
AU - Suen, Yi Nam
AU - Wu, Yongda
AU - Li, Ho Cheung William
AU - Cheung, Yee Tak Derek
AU - Kwong, Antonio Cho Sshing
AU - Lai, Vienna Wai Yin
AU - Chan, Sophia Siu Chee
AU - Lam, Tai Hing
AU - Wang, Man Ping
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Society for the Study of Addiction
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Background and aims: Proactive brief cessation advice by a lay counsellor combined with a referral to a smoking cessation service (active referral) is effective in increasing service use and quitting in community smokers. We compared the effect of two modified approaches to referrals on the cessation outcomes in community smokers. Design: Three-arm cluster-randomized trial. Setting: General community in Hong Kong. Participants: Daily cigarette smokers (n = 1163; 77.7% male). Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive on-site active referral (OSR, n = 395), where lay counsellors helped participants make appointments with a smoking cessation service of their choice plus tailored reminders; mobile text messaging referral (TMR, n = 385), where participants were encouraged to use a smoking cessation service via text messages; or brief cessation advice only (control, n = 383). Measurements: The primary outcome was a self-reported 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 6 months post-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 3 and 18 months, biochemically validated abstinence, smoking reduction and the use of cessation services at 3, 6 and 18 months. Findings: Using intention-to-treat analysis, the OSR (17.7%) and TMR (17.1%) groups had significantly higher self-reported abstinence than the control (12.0%) group at 6 months [odds ratio (OR) for OSR versus control = 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06–2.36; OR for TMR versus control = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.01–2.28; both P ' 0.05]. The corresponding validated abstinence rates at 6 months were 7.6, 7.8 and 3.9% (OR for TMR versus control = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.07–3.81; OR for TMR versus control = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.10–3.92; both P ' 0.05). Self-reported and validated abstinence were similar at 18 months. OSR groups had higher rates of smoking cessation service use than the control group at all follow-ups (all P ' 0.001). The smoking reduction rates were similar in continuing smokers. Conclusions: Simple active referrals (in person or via text messaging) to smoking cessation services increased abstinence rates among smokers in Hong Kong compared with general brief cessation advice. On-site active referral increased the use of smoking cessation services compared with general brief cessation advice.
AB - Background and aims: Proactive brief cessation advice by a lay counsellor combined with a referral to a smoking cessation service (active referral) is effective in increasing service use and quitting in community smokers. We compared the effect of two modified approaches to referrals on the cessation outcomes in community smokers. Design: Three-arm cluster-randomized trial. Setting: General community in Hong Kong. Participants: Daily cigarette smokers (n = 1163; 77.7% male). Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive on-site active referral (OSR, n = 395), where lay counsellors helped participants make appointments with a smoking cessation service of their choice plus tailored reminders; mobile text messaging referral (TMR, n = 385), where participants were encouraged to use a smoking cessation service via text messages; or brief cessation advice only (control, n = 383). Measurements: The primary outcome was a self-reported 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 6 months post-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 3 and 18 months, biochemically validated abstinence, smoking reduction and the use of cessation services at 3, 6 and 18 months. Findings: Using intention-to-treat analysis, the OSR (17.7%) and TMR (17.1%) groups had significantly higher self-reported abstinence than the control (12.0%) group at 6 months [odds ratio (OR) for OSR versus control = 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06–2.36; OR for TMR versus control = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.01–2.28; both P ' 0.05]. The corresponding validated abstinence rates at 6 months were 7.6, 7.8 and 3.9% (OR for TMR versus control = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.07–3.81; OR for TMR versus control = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.10–3.92; both P ' 0.05). Self-reported and validated abstinence were similar at 18 months. OSR groups had higher rates of smoking cessation service use than the control group at all follow-ups (all P ' 0.001). The smoking reduction rates were similar in continuing smokers. Conclusions: Simple active referrals (in person or via text messaging) to smoking cessation services increased abstinence rates among smokers in Hong Kong compared with general brief cessation advice. On-site active referral increased the use of smoking cessation services compared with general brief cessation advice.
KW - Active referral
KW - clinical trial
KW - community smoker
KW - lay counsellor
KW - service use
KW - smoking cessation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082198615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082198615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/add.15029
DO - 10.1111/add.15029
M3 - Article
C2 - 32149425
AN - SCOPUS:85082198615
SN - 0965-2140
VL - 115
SP - 1902
EP - 1912
JO - Addiction
JF - Addiction
IS - 10
ER -