COSTS AND BENEFITS OF AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HONG KONG

William F. Barron, Joseph Liu, T. H. Lam, C. M. Wong, Jean Peters, Anthony Hedley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A respiratory health survey conducted in Hong Kong in 1989 identified significant health differences between school age children living in an industrial area with poor ambient air quality and those in a control group living in a relatively clean area. In 1990, the government banned the use of high sulphur fuel. As a result, ambient sulfur levels dropped sharply and particulate levels dropped moderately. The avoided costs of doctor consultations alone offset a moderate fraction of the costs of this air quality improvement. If even the lower end of estimates from elsewhere apply to Hong Kong's willingness to pay for symptom relief, such values offset a major share of the costs of the air quality improvement simply through near‐term improvements in health. Considering longer‐term health and other benefits leads one to conclude that the economic benefits likely far outweigh the costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-117
Number of pages13
JournalContemporary Economic Policy
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1995

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Business,Management and Accounting
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Administration

Cite this