TY - JOUR
T1 - Adolescents' experience of comments about their weight prevalence, accuracy and effects on weight misperception
AU - Lo, Wing Sze
AU - Mak, Kwok Kei
AU - Lai, Yuen Kwan
AU - Lam, Tai Hing
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Background. Weight comments are commonly received by adolescents, but the accuracy of the comments and their effects on weight misperception are unclear. We assessed the prevalence and accuracy of weight comments received by Chinese adolescents from different sources and their relation to weight misperception. Methods. In the Hong Kong Student Obesity Surveillance (HKSOS) project 200607, 22612 students aged 1118 (41.5% boys) completed a questionnaire on obesity. Students responded if family members, peers and professionals had seriously commented over the past 30 days that they were "too fat" or "too thin" in two separate questions. The accuracy of the comments was judged against the actual weight status derived from self-reported height and weight. Self-perceived weight status was also reported and any discordance with the actual weight status denoted weight misperception. Logistic regression yielded adjusted odd ratios for weight misperception by the type of weight comments received. Results. One in three students received weight comments, and the mother was the most common source of weight comments. Health professional was the most accurate source of weight comments, yet less than half the comments were correct. Adolescents receiving incorrect comments had increased risk of having weight misperception in all weight status groups. Receiving conflicting comments was positively associated with weight misperception among normal weight adolescents. In contrast, underweight and overweight/obese adolescents receiving correct weight comments were less likely to have weight misperception. Conclusion. Weight comments, mostly incorrect, were commonly received by Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong, and such incorrect comments were associated with weight misperception.
AB - Background. Weight comments are commonly received by adolescents, but the accuracy of the comments and their effects on weight misperception are unclear. We assessed the prevalence and accuracy of weight comments received by Chinese adolescents from different sources and their relation to weight misperception. Methods. In the Hong Kong Student Obesity Surveillance (HKSOS) project 200607, 22612 students aged 1118 (41.5% boys) completed a questionnaire on obesity. Students responded if family members, peers and professionals had seriously commented over the past 30 days that they were "too fat" or "too thin" in two separate questions. The accuracy of the comments was judged against the actual weight status derived from self-reported height and weight. Self-perceived weight status was also reported and any discordance with the actual weight status denoted weight misperception. Logistic regression yielded adjusted odd ratios for weight misperception by the type of weight comments received. Results. One in three students received weight comments, and the mother was the most common source of weight comments. Health professional was the most accurate source of weight comments, yet less than half the comments were correct. Adolescents receiving incorrect comments had increased risk of having weight misperception in all weight status groups. Receiving conflicting comments was positively associated with weight misperception among normal weight adolescents. In contrast, underweight and overweight/obese adolescents receiving correct weight comments were less likely to have weight misperception. Conclusion. Weight comments, mostly incorrect, were commonly received by Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong, and such incorrect comments were associated with weight misperception.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69449101101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69449101101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-9-271
DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-9-271
M3 - Article
C2 - 19642972
AN - SCOPUS:69449101101
SN - 1472-698X
VL - 9
JO - BMC Public Health
JF - BMC Public Health
M1 - 271
ER -