A randomized controlled trial of two different lengths of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation

Abu S. Abdullah, Anthony J. Hedley, Sophia S.C. Chan, Tai Hing Lam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined if 2-week free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) would be more effective than 1-week free NRT to help smokers quit smoking at 6 and 12 months. In a single-blinded randomized controlled trial design, 562 Chinese smokers who attended a smoking cessation clinic in Hong Kong, China, were randomly allocated into two groups (A1 and A2): A1 (n=284) received behavioural counselling with free NRT for 1 week; A2 (n=278) received similar counselling with free NRT for 2 weeks. All subjects received printed self-help materials to support their quitting efforts. A structured questionnaire was used for data collection, including pattern of NRT use and self-reported 7-day point prevalence quit rate at 6 months and 12 months. Among the participants, the mean number of cigarettes smoked per day was 18.8 (SD=10.9). By intention-to-treat analysis, 7-day point prevalence quit rates were not significantly different between A1 and A2 groups at 6-month (27.5% versus 27.3%; P=0.97) and 12-month (21.1% versus 21.2%; P=0.98) followup. The findings suggest that two-week free NRT was not more effective than 1-week free NRT to increase smoking cessation rate among Chinese smokers.

Original languageEnglish
Article number961751
JournalBioMed Research International
Volume2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • General Immunology and Microbiology

Cite this